Financial Fraudster News Investigations can reveal that following the press release to the offices of the Lord Chief Justice, HM Courts and Tribunal Service and the Ministry of Justice in the wake of the published article where court officials admit that RPC did file court documents acted on by the judges above [from top left to right Justice Sir Robin Knowles and Lord Justice Popplewell and from bottom left to right Chief Master Marsh and Lord Justice Flaux] who allowed and endorsed a £10m High Court fraud by the State of Libya aided by leading law firm RPC who notably were allowed to file documents in breach warranty of authority.
The actions are compounded by the fact that evidence not challenged as the opposing party had not been served with court documents in the relevant proceedings.
Details have emerged that a greedy fame seeking lawyer Mohammed Shaban of MS Legal Solicitors in fact a one man operation submitted false statements to the High Court on behalf of the lawless State of Libya which stated that Libya during Gaddafi regime had in fact paid for a Hampstead mansion with diverted funds from the Libyan public purse.
Financial Fraudster News Investigations has seen two sets of statements from the corrupt Shaban and Gregory Mitchell QC dated the same dated giving two contradictory versions of events and signed by a statement of truth, but evidence from Libyan officials not seen by the High Court show that no evidence existed that funds came from Libya instead it came from investors who paid for the property via a special purpose vehicle based in the British Virgin Islands to allow members of the Gaddafi family to use in order to gain easier access to high level Gaddafi officials and Gaddafi himself to approve business contracts.
RPC was allowed by judges sleeping at the wheel of justice to submit documents and crucially the draft order that judges approved without questioning RPC right to submit any such document that resulted in the fraud by the State of Libya and Shaban later to be consummated by the negligent Lord Justice Flaux, Chief Master Marsh, Justice Sir Robin Knowles and Lord Justice Popplewell in no particular order.
Financial Fraudster News Investigations can reveal from court filings that Shaban and the State of Libya are now subject to court proceedings and a disclosure application for supporting evidence to support the facts that the cabal of judges didn’t ask to see that of evidence of the financial link of Libyan funds to the Hampstead property which included a statement from former CEO of the Libyan Investment Authority Rafik Nayed who stated that no link to the State of Libyan funds exist.
Financial Fraudster News Investigations can reveal from court filings at Bristol County Court that Shaban wrote to the High Court and has asked for Chief Master Marsh who previously failed to uphold impartiality in favour of Shaban to specifically to oversee a disclosure application, these proceedings are normally a lower court matter. The question that immediately arises is why?
A debt holder of Capitana Seas debt stated; “We debt holders have been patient to date and our patience has been wearing thin, we have asked management [Capitana Seas Ltd] to get their act together it’s clear that a cabal of judges have acted shamefully and negligently and have allowed a massive fraud under their noses to ensue and we will continue to raise issues about the cover-up and of those that have aided and abetted the cover-up who were involved, I am shock that Chief Master Marsh may be involved again.”
Financial Fraudster News Investigations spoke to a Cayman Islands debt holder who stated; “I have major concerns over British justice and their conservative handling of breaches of warranty of authority we hear about an old boys’ network in the UK, but when I look at how RPC is getting away with this breach of warranty of authority without sanction to date I am angry, I am told by the directors [Capitana Seas Ltd] that new evidence exists that clearly shows they [RPC] knew a fraud was in progress and were just simply greedy for fees, I hope they get punished.”
A judge is an appointed official who conducts court proceedings. Judges must be impartial and strive to properly interpret the meaning, significance, and implications of the law. Judges must also recognize that justice means more than just interpreting the law — they must also show compassion and understanding for the people on both sides of the case.
Breach of warranty of authority claims arise in circumstances where a solicitor is alleged to have incorrectly represented that he has authority to act on behalf of a particular client and induces a third party to act in a manner in which he would not have acted had the representation not been made.
So, how has three top judges and the High Court Chief Master allowed RPC to file submissions, documents when they are not on record and are in breach of warranty of authority?
A spokeman for the Solicitors Regulation Authority stated: "We have recieved no complaint regarding the alleged conduct of RPC, but we would be astonished in such a high profile case that RPC could or would submit documents, but if true, it appears that several judges were possibly negligent in allowing solicitors not on record to act for a party in which an order at least was drawn on a unlawful submission."
Financial Fraudster News Investigations has confirmation from an unnamed High Court official that RPC was in fact not on record as acting for The State of Libya in proceedings against Capitana Seas Ltd (BVI) in 2012.
Financial Fraudster News Investigations contacted relevant parties relevant to this article SRA, RPC, The Lord Chancellor, Lord Chief and the Ministry of Justice all have declined to comment
Breaking news
Article Link:
 RPC_High Court 9 March 2012 | [RPC not on record confirmation] | 111 kB |
