Northern Circuit District Judge Moss is accused of making a bogus order in secret hearings akin to a despotic state at the County Court at Manchester to deprive a fraud victim of a default judgment won against crooked solicitor Jonathan Just aka Alvin Just former solicitor and director of Just and Brown Solicitors Ltd by setting aside a default judgment on 22 April 2020 without giving the Claimant in the proceedings a right to challenge the lone judge’s order by making the order based on the flawed information as stated in his judgment.
Financial Fraudster News Investigations has seen court filings that identifies exactly what DJ Moss relied on when he struck out the Claimant's £250K judgment obtained on 8 October 2019 in a secret hearing for the losses incurred from a fraud committed by Just and Brown Solicitors Ltd led by the former solicitor now struck off by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and Law Society and pursued by law enforcement which left the Claimant homeless, destitute and reliant of charity from friends following the death of her husband.
Financial Fraudster News Investigations can reveal that the fraudsters acted as solicitors for the Claimant during the sale of her Wood Green property in 2016 which resulted in Mr Just selling the property to a member of his fraud ring and pocketing the profits and the redemption that was due to the mortgage lender in any sale of mortgaged property. Mr Just has fled the UK and was last traced to the Caribbean leaving the Claimant homeless, without money due from the sale that has resulted in mental health issues.
Financial Fraudster News Investigations have investigated claims made by DJ Moss that he has satisfied himself with in the secret hearings that run contrary to precedent set in a Court of Appeal case Frey v Labrouche (2012) [2011] EWHC 3854 (Ch) at paragraph 43, when it was held by Lord Neuberger, Master of the rolls who in his concluding remarks stated:
“However, even assuming that the decision in this case was a case management or procedural decision, it was simply unsustainable. It is fundamentally wrong for a judge to refuse to hear oral argument on behalf of a party whom the judge has decided to find against on reading the papers. In the event, therefore, these appeals against the Judge's decision to dismiss the trustees' strike out applications must be remitted to the Chancery Division to be heard as soon as reasonably possible by another Judge”
Financial Fraudster News Investigations identified DJ Moss’s main and bizarre thrust of the reason behind his order, the Claimant’s service address, he speculated that an address provided to the court for service that was provided by Mailbox etc a national franchise for mailbox services was not suitable for service as he thought that the claimant did not carry on business at the address.
Financial Fraudster News Investigations also investigated allegations that an application to assigned the debt by the Claimant due to the time taken to progress a charge on the Defendant's assets found in the UK was slow and ponderous of which the Claimant needed funds to prevent being made homeless.
DJ Moss made a flawed and reckless statement that the proposed application that would involve a company called DEZ Holdings Ltd which the negligent judge assumed that it was linked to a person who was the subject of a general civil restraint order. Financial Fraudster News Investigations have crossed checked the name on the register and again the decision made by DJ Moss is flawed and has perverted the course of justice.
Financial Fraudster News Investigations spoke to a DEZ Holdings Ltd spokesman who stated: "The conduct of the judge is all that is bad in the English civil justice system when our courts start holding covert hearings on their own that's when corrupt judges surface, in this case for a judge to state we are involved with anyone who we are not connected with is a lie and from a judge is indicate to the wider society what standards our judiciary have stooped to. For the avoidance of doubt the judge is simply wrong we have no links to the person he has mentioned in his order, this is not North Korea or Russia where the judiciary gives little regard to civil rights and the rule of law."
It is abundantly clear that had the bungling judge asked the Claimant he would have seen evidence that in fact that was where all the Claimant’s mail went to a the only safe address that was permanent due to homelessness as a result of becoming destitute.
It is a fundamental feature of the English civil justice system, and indeed any civilised modern justice system, that a party should be allowed to bring his application to court, and make his case out to a judge.
Financial Fraudster News Investigations DJ Moss is no stranger to controversy in an appeal against an ealier decision in Percy v Anderson-Young [2017] EWHC 2712 (QB) when Spencer J criticised his ruling which caused harm to a party following his ruling.
Financial Fraudster News Investigations can confirm that the Claimant is now considering an application to set aside the baseless order by DJ Moss who has reserved the matter for himself at the County Court at Manchester.
Financial Fraudster News Investigations will keep readers updated on any forthcoming proceedings.
The Lord Chancellor, Lord Chief and the Ministry of Justice has declined to comment
